Theoretical Foundation of Dialectics of Economic Development in Karl Marx’s Capital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2018-3-3Keywords:
Marx, material production relations, the social aims of production, the topic and focus of economic research, economic progress, theoretical and methodological thinkingAbstract
The article deals with the logical and theoretical structure of K. Marx’s «Capital». In the «Theories of Surplus Value», there is the ascent from the concrete to the abstract in the history of economic thought. This ascent allowed to define the goods as a starting point for the political economy of the capitalist mode of production. But there is no direct way to the economic theory of Marx, whose subject is not the products labour activity, but the material production relations arising during these activities. While researching the goods, Marx uses the «power of abstraction», which allows separating «economic matter» from the «naturally tangible» material basis: use value, concrete labour, etc. An integral system of economic categories is based on the synthesis of natural historical thinking phenomena discovered by Aristotle; Hegel’s understanding of purposive activity; specific goals of social production, which are realized in property relations. K. Marx introduces into scientific knowledge the notion of economic progress as a change of social formations. He considers the significance of different models of the division of labour for determining the concept of value. In A. Smith’s model, the value is determined a posteriori, after market evaluation of the products or services produced. A unit of measurement is not working time in itself, but economic information on the effectiveness of its use, i.e. money. In the model of K. Marx, the value is determined a priori, in the form of labour costs in the physiological sense. Given a choice, the labour expended receives a marginal evaluation in the form of alternative costs (loss of profits). The meaning of the «absolute, universal law of capitalist accumulation» is identified as a causa finalis, which determines the value of the commodity labour, variable capital, surplus value. I conclude that the development of the dialectics of the topic and the focus of an economic study allows using the method of rational eclecticism if the corresponding material is subject to a subsequent dialectical-materialistic interpretation.References
Marx, K. (1960). Kapital. Kritika politicheskoy ekonomii. Tom I. Kn. 1.: Protsess proizvodstva kapitala [Capital. Critique of political economy. Volume one. Book 1: The process of capital production]. In Marx, K. & Engels, F. Soch. [Collected works]. 2nd ed. Vol. 23, 907. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoye izdatelstvo politicheskoy literatury Publ., 907. (In Russ.)
Marx, K. (1959). K kritike politicheskoy ekonomii [To the Critique of Political Economy]. In Marx, K. & Engels, F. Soch. [Collected works]. 2nd ed. Vol. 13. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoy literatury Publ., 770. (In Russ.)
Marx, K. (1968). Ekonomicheskie rukopisi 1857—1859 godov (pervonachalnyy variant “Kapitala”). CH. I. Vvedenie [Economic Manuscripts of 1857–1859 (the original version of «Capital»). Part one. Introduction]. In Marx, K. & Engels, F. Soch. [Collected works]. 2nd ed. Vol. 46. Pt. 1, 17–48. Mosocw: Gosudarstvennoye izdatelstvo politicheskoy literatury Publ., 559. (In Russ.)
Gobbs, T. (1991). Leviafan, ili materiya, forma i vlast gosudarstva tserkovnogo i grazhdanskogo [Leviathan, or Matter, Form and Power of the Church and Civil State]. Sochineniya: v 2 t. [Collected works: In 2 volumes]. Vol. 2. Moscow: Mysl Publ., 736. (In Russ.)
Blaug, M. (2004). Metodologiya ekonomicheskoy nauki, ili Kak ekonomisty obyasnyayut: per. s angl. [Methodology of Economic Science, or How Economists Explain. Trans from English]. In: V. S. Avtonomov (Ed.). Moscow: NP Zhurnal “Voprosy ekonomiki” Publ., 416. (In Russ.)
Blaug, M. (1994). Ekonomicheskaya mysl v retrospektive [Economic Theory in Retrospect]. Moscow: Delo Ltd Publ., 720. (In Russ.)
Avtonomov, V. S., Ananyin, O. I. & Makashevoy, N. A. (Eds). (2009). Istoriya ekonomicheskikh ucheniy: ucheb. posobie dlya studentov vuzov [History of economic doctrines: textbook for university students]. Moscow: Infra-M Publ., 784. (In Russ.)
Hegel, G. W. F. (2017). Nauka logiki. T. I. Obektivnaya logika [Science of Logic. Volume I. Objective logic]. Trans. from German by B. G. Stolpner. Primedia E-launch LLC, 540. (In Russ.)
Marx, K. & Engels, F. (1955). Nemetskaya ideologiya [The German Ideology]. In Marx, K. & Engels, F. Soch. [Collected works]. 2nd ed. Vol. 3. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoye izdatel’stvo politicheskoy literatury Publ., 650. (In Russ.)
Marx, K. (1955). K kritike gegelevskoy filosofii prava [Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right]. In Marx, K. & Engels, F. Soch. [Collected works]. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoye izdatelstvo politicheskoy literatury Publ., 698. (In Russ.)
Lenin, V. I. (1969). Filosofskie tetradi [Philosophical notebooks]. Poln. Sobr. Soch. 5-e izd. [Full Collected Works. 5 ed.]. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoye izdatelstvo politicheskoy literatury Publ., 782. (In Russ.)
Smith, A. Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov. Kn. 1 [An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. B. 1]. Retrieved from: https://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/Econom/smit/index.php (date of access: 23.05.18.). (In Russ.)
Marx, K. (1962). Teorii pribavochnoy stoimosti. IV t. “Kapitala”. Ch. 1 [Theories of Surplus Value (IV volume of «Capital») Part 1]. In Marx, K. & Engels, F. Soch. [Collected works]. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo politicheskoy literatury Publ., 476. (In Russ.)
Dyatel, E. P. (1987). Sistemnyy analiz obekta i predmeta v “Kapitale” K. Marksa [System analysis of the object and the subject in K. Marx’s Capital]. Irkutsk: Irkut. Un-t Publ., 224. (In Russ.)
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970). Nauka logiki. V 3-kh t. T. 1 [The science of logic. In three volumes. Volume I]. Moscow: Gl. red. sotsialno-ekonomicheskoy literatury Publ., 471. (In Russ.)
Engels, F. (1961). Anti-Dyuring [Herr Eugen Dühring’s Revolution in Science]. In Marx, K. & Engels, F. Soch. [Collected works]. 2nd ed. Vol. 20, 1–338. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoye izdatelstvo politicheskoy literatury Publ., 827. (In Russ.)
Hegel, G. W. F. (1972). Nauka logiki. V 3-kh t. T. 3 [Science of Logic. In three volumes. Volume 3]. Moscow: Gl. red. sotsialno-ekonomicheskoy literatury Publ., 371. (In Russ.)
Robbins, L. Predmet ekonomicheskoy nauki [Subject of economic science]. Thesis. Teoriya i istoriya ekonomicheskikh i sotsialnykh institutov i sistem. Zima`93 [Thesis. Theory and history of economic and social institutions and systems. Winter `93], 10–23. (In Russ.)
Rikardo, D. (1955). Nachala politicheskoy ekonomii i nalogovogo oblozheniya [On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation]. Soch. T. 1 [Collected Works Vol. 1]. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoye izdatelstvo politicheskoy literatury Publ., 360. (In Russ.)
Marx, K. (1961). Zamechaniya na knigu A. Vagnera “Uchebnik politicheskoy ekonomii” [Wagner’s book «Textbook of Political Economy»]. In Marx, K. & Engels, F. Soch. [Collected works]. 2nd ed. Vol. 19, 369–399. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoye izdatelstvo politicheskoy literatury Publ., 670. (In Russ.)
Yang, X. & Wai-Man, L. (2001). Increasing Returns and Inframarginal Economics. Inframarginal Economics, 4, 924.
Petrenko, D. S. (2017). Inframarzhinalnyy analiz instituta firmy [Inframarginal analysis of institute of firm]. Vestnik UrFU [Bulletin of Ural Federal University], 16(2), 174–190. (Series Economics and Management). (In Russ.)
Kuhn, T. (1975). Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy [Structure of Scientific Revolutions]. Trans. form English by I. Z. Naletova. Moscow: Progress Publ., 288. (In Russ.)
Sidorovich, A. V. (Ed.) Kurs ekonomicheskoy teorii. Obshchie osnovy ekonomicheskoy teorii. Mikroekonomika. Makroekonomika. Osnovy natsionalnoy ekonomiki: ucheb. posobie [The course of economic theory. General foundations of economic theory. Microeconomics. Macroeconomics. Fundamentals of National Economy: Textbook]. 2nd revised and enlarged edition. Moscow: Delo i servis Publ., 832. (In Russ.)
Ivleva, G. Yu. (2003). Ratsionalnaya eklektika kak vyrazhenie krizisa ekonomicheskoy teorii i sposob vykhoda iz nego [Rational eclecticism as an expression of the crisis of economic theory and the way out of it]. Filosofiya khozyaystva [Philosophy of economy], 3(24), 99–108. (In Russ.)
Ivleva, G. Yu. (2006). Sovremennoye sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya metodologii ekonomicheskoy nauki [The current state and prospects for the development of the methodology of economic science]. Metodologiya ekonomicheskikh issledovaniy: osnovnye podkhody i problemy: ucheb. posobie [Methodology of economic research: basic approaches and problems: Textbook]. Moscow: MAP pri Pravitelstve g. Moskvy Publ., 158. (In Russ.)
Engels, F. V. (1966). Borgiusu, 25 yanvarya 1894 g. [Borgius, January 25, 1894]. In Marx, K. & Engels, F. Soch. [Collected works]. 2nd ed. Vol. 39, 174–177. Moscow: Izdatelstvo politicheskoy literatury Publ., 713. (In Russ.)
Schumpeter, Y. A. (2001). Istoriya ekonomicheskogo analiza: per. s angl. [History of economic analysis: trans. from English]. In: V. S. Avtonomov (Ed.). In 3 vol. Vol. 1, 552; Vol. 2, 504; Vol. 3, 688. St. Petersburg: Ekonomicheskaya shkola Publ. (In Russ.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Evgeny Petrovitch Dyatel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
