Regional Convergence of Fertility in Russia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2019-3-9Keywords:
fertility, total fertility rate, russian regions, regional differentiation, ϭ-convergence, ß-convergence, γ-convergence, divergence, regression, demographic transitionAbstract
The balance of the regions’ demographic dynamics in many ways determines the country’s sustainable demographic development. The high level of the regional fertility differentiation, historically manifested in Russia, requires the development of specific tools. These tools are necessary for analysing the regional imbalance as well as the trends of the regions’ convergence (divergence) in terms of fertility rate. The study analyses convergence of fertility in Russia. For this purpose, I developed a theoretical and methodological framework that assesses the concept of convergence at three levels: ideological and political, theoretical, and instrumental and applied. Methodological approaches to analysing the fertility’s convergence allow assessing the dynamics of the fertility’s interregional dispersion, the structural impact in the tendencies of regional convergence, as well as the changes of the regions’ ranked positions in terms of fertility. I demonstrated the methods of analysing ϭ-, ß-, γ-convergence. Further, I tested the developed tools using the data on the total fertility rate for the period from 1990 to 2016. A separate analysis was conducted for the period from 2007, when the measures aimed at supporting fertility significantly strengthened. The results of the study have demonstrated that in the historical perspective there was no fertility convergence. Moreover, there is no fertility convergence in the period of active implementation of the state measures to support fertility. Thus, the recent demographic policy is yet to produce a positive effect in relation to levelling the regional differences in fertility. I concluded that analysing the regional fertility’s convergence allows understanding the nature and prospects of the population’s reproduction processes in the country. This analysis expands the information base for making management decisions in the sphere of demographics and allows addressing the demographic problems in Russia as it contributes to the growth of effectiveness of the measures to support and stimulate fertility. The study of the so-called club convergence is a prospective direction for further research.References
Lanzieri, G. (2014). Is fertility converging across the member states of the European Union? Demographic Review, 1(2), 110–139.
Sakharov, A. D. (2006). Konvergentsiya, mirnoe sushchestvovanie [Convergence, peaceful existence]. In: E. N. Saveleva (Ed.), Andrey Dmitrievich Sakharov. Bibliograficheskiy spravochnik: v 2 ch. Ch. 1.: Trudy [Andrey Dmitrievich Sakharov. Bibliographical guide: in 2 p. Part 1: Works]. Moscow: Human Rights, 368. Retrieved from: http://www.sakharov-archive.ru/ (Date of access: 15.12.2018). (In Russ.)
Sorokin, P. A. (1992). Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiya. Obshchestvo [Person. Civilization. Society]. Moscow: Politizdat, 543. (In Russ.)
Galbraith, J. (2008). Novoe industrialnoe obshchestvo. Izbrannoe [The New Industrial State (1967)]. Trans. from English. Moscow: Eksmo, 1200. (In Russ.)
Solow, R. M. A. (1956). Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94.
Gerschenkron, А. (2015). Ekonomicheskaya otstalost v istoricheskoy perspective [Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective]. Trans. from English. Moscow: Delo, 536. (In Russ.)
Landry, А. (2014). Demograficheskaya revolutsiya [Demographic Revolution (1933)]. Trans. from English. Demoscope Weekly, 611–612. Retrieved from: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2014/0611/nauka02.php (Date of access: 20.02.2019). (In Russ.)
Thompson, W. S. (1929). Population. The American Journal of Sociology, 34(6), 959–975.
Lesthaeghe, R. (2011). The «second demographic transition»: a conceptual map for the understanding of late modern demographic developments in fertility and family formation. Historical social research, 36, 179–218. DOI: 10.2307/41151280
Van de Kaa, D. J. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Population Bulletin, 42(1), 1–59.
Coleman, D. (2006). Immigration and ethnic change in low-fertility countries: a third demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 32(3), 401–446.
Zakharov, S. V. (2012). Rozhdaemost v Rossii: pervyy i vtoroy demograficheskiy perekhod [Fertility in Russia: the first and second demographic transitions]. Demoscope Weekly, Chitalnyy zal [Demoscope Weekly, reading room]. [Electronic source]. URL: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/knigi/konfer/konfer_08.html (Date of access: 18.12.2018). (In Russ.)
Vishnevskiy, A. G. (2014). Demograficheskaya revolyutsiya menyaet reproduktivnuyu strategiyu vida Homo sapiens [The demographic revolution is changing the reproductive strategy of Homo sapiens]. Demograficheskoe obozrenie [Demographic Review], 1(1), 6–33. DOI: 10.17323/demreview.v1i1.1825 (In Russ.)
Klupt, М. (2014). Paradigmy i oppozitsii sovremennoy demografii [Paradigms and oppositions of modern demography]. Demograficheskoe obozrenie [Demographic Review], 1(1), 34–56. DOI: 10.17323/demreview.v1i1.1826. (In Russ.)
Barro, R. (1991). Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407–443.
Barro, R. & Sala-I-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), 223–251. DOI: 10.1086/261816.
Sala-I-Martin, X. (1996). The Classical Approach to Convergence Analysis. The Economic Journal, 106(437), 1019–1036. DOI: 10.2307/2235375.
Dubuc, S. (2012). Immigration to the UK from High-Fertility Countries: Intergenerational Adaptation and Fertility Convergence. Population and Development Review, 38(2), 353–368. DOI: 10.1111/j.1728–4457.2012.00496.x.
Haines, M. (2002). Ethnic Differences in Demographic Behavior in the United States: Has There Been Convergence? Historical Methods, 36(4), 157–195. DOI: 10.1080/01615440309604818.
Franklin, R. S. & Plane D. A. (2004). Shift-Share Method for the Analysis of Regional Fertility Change: An Application to the Decline in Childbearing in Italy, 1952–1991. Geographical Analysis, 36(1), 1–20. DOI: 10.1353/geo.2003.0021.
Strulik, H. & Vollmer, S. (2013). The fertility transition around the world. Journal of Population Economics, 28(1), 31–44. DOI: 10.1007/s00148–013–0496–2.
Dorius, S. F. (2008). Global Demographic Convergence? A Reconsideration of Changing Intercountry Inequality in Fertility. Population and Development Review, 34(3), 519–537. DOI: 10.1111/j.1728–4457.2008.00235.x.
Sinitsa, A. L. (2017). Rozhdaemost v regionakh Rossii: konvergentsiya ili divergentsiya [Fertility in the Regions of Russia: Convergence or Divergence]. Region: Ekonomika i Sotsiologiya [Region: Economics & Sociology], 2(94), 152–173. DOI: 10.15372/reg20170207. (In Russ.)
Osberg, L. (2016). On the limitations of some current usages of the Gini Index. Dalhousie University Working Paper, 1, 18. Retrieved from: https://www.dal.ca/content/dam/dalhousie/pdf/faculty/science/economics/researcharchives/A note on limitations working paper.pdf (Date of access: 12.01.2019).
Kapitanov, V. A., Ivanova, A. A. & Maksimova, A. Y. (2018). Problemy chislovykh otsenok neravenstva [The problems of numerical inequalities estimates]. Statistika i ekonomika [Statistics and Economics], 15(4), 4–15. DOI: 10.21686/2500–3925–2018–4-4–15. (In Russ.)
Young, A. T., Higgins, M. J. & Levy, D. (2008). Sigma Convergence versus Beta Convergence: Evidence from U.S. County-Level Data. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 40(5), 1083- 1093.
Boyle, G. E. & McCarthy, T. G. (1999). Simple measures of convergence in per capita GDP: a note on some further international evidence. Applied Economics Letters, 6(6), 343–347. DOI: 10.1080/135048599353041.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Oksana Mikhaylovna Shubat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
