Model of Federal-Regional Relations in Governance of Higher Education in the Russian Federation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2020-1-15Keywords:
federalism in higher education, centralisation, benchmarks, regional development, the balance of federal and regional relations, authority, "pragmatic" federalism, heterogeneity, coordination, accessibility of educationAbstract
Models of governance of higher education in large and heterogeneous countries with numerous universities significantly differ from approaches to coordinating universities in unitary states. The research literature still lacks in-depth analysis of these differences. At the same time, achievement of national goals for the higher educations development in federal countries requires an effective model for the distribution of responsibilities between government’s federal and regional levels. The paper studies the structure of a model of federal-regional relations in higher education in the Russian Federation. For this purpose, I consider the history and preconditions for shaping the model of federalism in higher education. Additionally, I examine the present balance of federal and regional powers in governance of higher education. The article analyses the structure of federalism in higher education in the Russian Federation in comparison with eight countries characterised by heterogeneous regional higher education systems. The study’s results have shown that Russian model of federalism in higher education remains one of the most centralised among comparable countries. Budget and tax policies are the prerogatives of the federal government, as the regions have limited opportunities to influence the development of universities, including restrictions on co-financing the federal universities. The model of governance of higher education in Russia is based on the principle of “pragmatic” federalism. This principle implies that the balance of federal-regional relations shoidd solve specific problems facing the country in general, not individual regions. Based on the analysis, the paper suggests directions for changing the balance of federal-regional relations in higher education. They involve the expansion of the principle of subsidiarity between levels of government, with the preservation of the majority of powers at the federal level. Governance of regional higher education systems should enable concentration of federal and regional resources on certain university programs and development projects.References
De Figueiredo, R. J. P. & Weingast, B. R. (2002). Pathologies of Federalism, Russian Style: Political Institutions and Economic Transition. Retrieved from: http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/rui/mpfrussia.pdf (Date of access: 15.02.2019)
Dneprov, E. D. (2011). Noveyshaya politicheskaya istoriya rossiyskogo obrazovaniya: opyt i uroki [The modern political history of Russian education: experience and lessons]. Moscow: Marios, 456. (In Russ.)
Carnoy, M., Froumin, I., Leshukov O. & Marginson S. (Eds.). (2018). Higher Education in Federal Countries: A Comparative Study. London: Sage, 478. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9789353280734
Brown, D., Cazalis, P. & Jasmin, G. (Eds.). (1992). Higher Education in Federal Systems: Proceedings of an international colloquium held at Queen’s University. Ottawa: Renouf Publishing, 250.
Fumasoli, T. (2015). Multi-level governance in higher education research. In: J. Huisman, H. de Boer, D. Dill, M. Souto- Otero (Eds.), Handbook of Higher Education Policy and Governance (pp. 76–94). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978–1- 137–45617–5
Mok, Ka-Ho. (2013). Centralization and decentralization: educational reforms and changing governance in Chinese societies. CERC Studies in Comparative Education, 13, 230. DOI: 10.1007/978–94–007–0956–0.
Chou, M.-H., Jungblut, J., Ravinet, P. & Vukasovic, M. (2017). Higher education governance and policy: an introduction to multi-issue, multi-level and multi-actor dynamics. Policy and Society, 36(1), 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/14494035.2017.1287999.
Braun, D. (2008). Organising the political coordination of knowledge and innovation policies. Science and Public Policy, 35(4), 227–239.
Peters, B. G. (2015). Pursuing horizontal managеment: the politics of public sector coordination. Kansas: University Press of Kansas, 256. DOI: 10.1111/gove.12238
Breton, A. (1996). Competitive Governments: An Economic Theory of Politics and Public Finance. Cambridge, 385.
Liebowitz, S. & Margolis, S. (2000). Path Dependence. In: B. Bouckaert, G. de Geest (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (pp. 981–998). Ghent: Edward Elgar and the University of Ghent.
Kuzminov, Ya. I., Semyonov, D. S. & Froumin, I. D. (2013). Struktura vuzovskoy seti: ot sovetskogo k rossiyskomu «master-planu» [University Network Structure: From the Soviet to the Russian “Master Plan”]. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational studies], 4, 8–63., DOI: 10.17323/1814–9545–2013–4-8–69 (In Russ.)
Kinelev, V. G. (1993). Regionalnaya politika v oblasti vysshego obrazovaniya: kakoy ey byt? [Regional higher educa- tion policy: how should it be?]. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii, 4, 14–24. (In Russ.)
Froumin, I. & Leshukov, O. (2015). National-Regional Relationships in Federal Higher Education Systems: The case of Russian Federation. Higher education forum Hiroshima University, 12, 77–94. DOI: 10.15027/37330.
Katrovskiy, A. P. (2003). Territorialnaya organizatsiya vysshey shkoly Rossii [Territorial organization of higher education in Russia]. Smolensk: Oikumena, 200. (In Russ.)
Commission of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (Bolsheviks) Short Course. (1939). New York: International Publishers, 364.
Kuhns, K. (2011). Globalization of knowledge and its impact on higher education reform in transitioning states: the case of Russia. Dissertation, School of education, Stanford University.
Bain, O. (2003). University Autonomy in the Russian Federation since Perestroika. New York: RoutledgeFalmer, 240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018268000038760.
Jones, A. (1994). The Educational Legacy of the Soviet Period. In: A. Jones, Education and Society in the New Russia (pp. 3–23). Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe.
Leshukov, O. V. & Borisova, L. V. (2014). Vysshie uchebnye zavedeniya v sotsialno-ekonomicheskom prostranstve [Approaches to assessment of the higher education system impact on social and economic development of a city (through the example of case of Moscow)]. Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya [Higher education today], 12, 34–40. (In Russ.)
Zhurakovskiy, V. M. (1995). Pravo na samostoyatelnost [The right for independence]. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii, 2, 21–30. (In Russ.)
Hollander, R. & Patapan, H. (2007). Pragmatic Federalism: Australian Federalism from Hawke to Howard. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(3), 280–297. DOI:10.1111/j.1467–8500.2007.00542.x.
Froumin, I. & Leshukov, O. (2018). The Russian Federation: Pragmatic Centralism in a Large and Heterogeneous Country. In: M. Carnoy, I. Froumin, O. Leshukov, S. Marginson (Eds.), Higher Education in Federal Countries: A Comparative Study (pp. 354–407). London: Sage. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9789353280734.n9.
Gabdrakhmanov, N., Nikiforova, N. & Leshukov, O. (2019). «Ot Volgi do Eniseya…»: obrazovatelnaya migratsiya molodezhi v Rossii [“From Volga to Yenisei...”: educational migration of youth in Russia]. Sovremennaya analitika obrazovaniya [Modern education analytics], 5(26), 48. (In Russ.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Oleg Valerievich Leshukov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
