Precarisation of Labour as a Growing Form of Employment of Young Specialists in the Context of the Covid-19 Pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-4-4Keywords:
precarisation, precariat, freelancers, underemployment, IT professionals, foreign students, precarious employment during the Covid-19 pandemic, labour market, employment, university graduates, young professionals, professional trajectories, financial success, higher educationAbstract
The Covid-19 pandemic has catalysed the inevitable digitalisation of communications and rapidly changed the organisation and technologies of professional activities of millions of employees worldwide. The growth of unemployment, the transition of professional groups to remote work (wherever possible) due to the need for isolation to minimise the spread of COVID-19 in 2020 led to radical changes in the labour market. Studying the processes of precariation can facilitate the search for responses to new challenges related to deregulation of labour relations. We are interested in examining the participation of youth in these processes. Young population is receptive to social innovation and has excellent competencies in the field of information technology. An analysis of professional trajectories of university graduates (employed in the Ural region and beyond) helps identify whether precarious employment in the labour market can be successful, and determine the characteristics of social groups involved. We used the monitoring of university graduates conducted in 2017-2019 based on survey and administrative data. To process the data, we applied the methods of classification and expert evaluations. The analysis showed that 34.4 % of university graduates belong to the precariat, with only 8.8 % being unemployed. Young freelancers and IT-professionals are successfully employed, satisfied with their jobs and high salaries, demonstrating high rates of employment in their specialty. The results can be applied for balancing precarious work; its best practices, accumulated by freelancers and IT-professionals, can be used as a social tool for regulating labour relations in an unfavourable epidemiological situation.References
Guy Standing. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2011. 198 с.
Bourdieu P. Acts of Resistance. Against the New Myths of our Time. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000. P. 108 с.
Greer I. Welfare reform, precarity and the re-commodification of labour // Work, Employment & Society. 2016. Vol. 30, iss 1. P. 162-173. doi.org/10.1177/0950017015572578.
Swider S. Informal and precarious work: The precariat and China // Rural China. 2017. Vol. 14, iss. 1. P. 19-41. https:// doi.org/10.1163/22136746-01401002.
Lee C. K. Precarization or Empowerment? Reflections on Recent Labor Unrest in China // Journal of Asian Studies. 2016. Vol. 75, iss. 2. P. 317-333. doi.org/10.1017/S0021911815002132.
Siegmann K. A., Schiphorst F. Understanding the globalizing precariat: From informal sector to precarious work // Progress in Development Studies. 2016. Vol. 16, iss 2. P. 111-123. doi.org/10.1177/1464993415623118.
Lazar S., Sanchez A. Understanding labour politics in an age of precarity // Dialectical Anthropology. 2019. Vol. 43, iss. 1. P. 3-14. doi.org/10.1007/s10624-019-09544-7.
Standing G. Understanding the precariat through labour and work // Development and Change. 2014. Vol. 45, iss. 5. P. 963-980. doi.org/10.1111/dech.12120.
Courtois A., O'Keefe T. Precarity in the ivory cage: Neoliberalism and casualisation of work in the Irish higher education sector // Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies. 2015. Vol. 13, iss. 1. P. 43-66.
Bunnell T. Teachers in international schools: a global educational ‘precariat'? // Globalisation, Societies and Education. 2015. Vol. 14, iss. 4. P. 543-559. doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2015.1068163.
Doherty C. Edufare for the future precariat: the moral agenda in Australia's ‘earning or learning' policy // Journal of Education Policy. 2016. Vol. 32, iss.1. P. 34-47. doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1215534.
Armano E., Murgia A. The precariousnesses of young knowledge workers: A subject-oriented approach // Global Discourse. 2013. Vol. 3, iss. 3-4. P. 486-501. doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2013.865313.
Hua J., Ray K. Beyond the precariat: race, gender, and labor in the taxi and Uber economy // Social Identities. 2017. Vol. 24, iss. 2. P. 271-289. doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2017.1321721.
Agergaard S., Ungruhe C. Ambivalent Precarity: Career Trajectories and Temporalities in Highly Skilled Sports Labor Migration from West Africa to Northern Europe // Anthropology of Work Review. 2016. Vol. 37, iss. 2. P. 67-78. doi: 10.1111/awr.12096.
Тощенко Ж. Т. Прекариат - новый социальный класс // Социологические исследования. 2015. № 6. С. 3-13.
Volchik V., Klimenko L., Posukhova O. Socio-economic sustainable development and the precariat: A case study of three Russian cities // Entrepreneurship and Sustainability issues. 2018. Vol. 6, iss. 1. P. 411-428. doi.org/10.9770/ jesi.2018.6.1(25).
Шкаратан О. И., Карачаровский В. В., Гасюкова Е. Н. Теория и эмпирический анализ. На материалах опросов в России, 1994-2013 // Социологические исследования. 2015. Vol. 12. P. 99-110.
Критерии, вероятность и степень неустойчивости занятости с учетом особенностей российского рынка труда / Бобков В. Н., Квачев В. Г., Локтюхина Н. В., Риччери М. // Экономика региона. 2017. Т. 13, вып. 3. С. 672-683. doi: 10.17059/2017-3-3.
Bender K. A., Roche K. Educational mismatch and self-employment // Economics of Education Review. 2013. Vol. 34. P. 85-95. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.01.010.
Меренков А. В., Сандлер Д. Г., Шаврин В. С. Особенности изменений ориентаций выпускников бакалавриата на трудоустройство // Образование и наука. 2019. № 21 (10). С. 116-142. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2019-10-116-142.
Прекариат. Становление нового класса. М.: Центр социального прогнозирования и маркетинга, 2020. 400 с.
Флорида Р. Креативный класс. Люди, которые создают будущее. М.: Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2016. 384 с.
Котова С. И. Прекаризация рынка труда - вызов экономики трудовому праву? // Экономика и жизнь. 2017. № 41 (992). URL: https://www.eg-online.ru/article/357991/ (дата обращения: 11.08.2020).
Rudakov V., Roshchin S. The impact of student academic achievement on graduate salaries: the case of a leading Russian university // Journal of Education and Work. 2019. Vol. 32, iss. 2. P. 156-180. doi: 10.1080/13639080.2019.1617839.
Павлова О. Н., Казин Ф. А., Бутаков Н. А. Профильность трудоустройства выпускников вузов. Анализ данных социальных сетей // Университетское управление. Практика и анализ. 2017. Т. 21, № 3 (109). С. 38-56. doi: 10.15826/umpa.2017.03.036.
Developing skills for innovative growth in the Russian Federation / Vasiliev K., Roshchin S., Maltseva I. O., Travkin P. V., Lukiyanova A., Chugunov D., Shulga I., Rutkowski J. J., Cahu P. M., Nellemann S. Washington: World Bank, 2013. 150 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Viktor A. Koksharov, Gavriil A. Agarkov, Anastasia D. Sushchenko

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

