Regional Income Inequality in Lithuania
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-4-7Keywords:
gini coefficient, decile ratio, Lorenz curve, coefficient of variation, income inequality, GDP per capita, average disposable household income per capita, gross hourly wages, administrative counties, Lithuanian RegionsAbstract
The problem of income inequality is globally relevant, receiving the attention of both scientists and politicians. Lithuania as a small country has made significant progress in approaching the standard of living in Western Europe. However, there are still differences in economic growth between separate population groups. Thus, the problem of income inequality remains very acute. Currently, researchers are widely discussing the risk of income inequality to the country’s society by analysing its causes and proposing various solutions. Although scientific debates address income inequality across regions, such studies are often limited to examples of large countries. Meanwhile, there is a lack of studies on regional income inequality in small countries, so the question of whether a small country is characterised by regional income inequality remains open. This research aims to examine the level of regional income inequality in Lithuania. We hypothesised that Lithuania has a high level of regional income inequality and this is one of the causes of the high income inequality in the whole country. To estimate regional income inequality, we used the most common measures: Gini coefficient, decile ratio, and the coefficient of variation. The analysis was performed at level 3 of the Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics (NUTS), according to which Lithuania is divided into 10 administrative counties. For this research, we chose the indicators illustrating income per capita on various levels, i.e., gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, average disposable household income per capita, and gross hourly wages, as the various types of income can be used. For the estimation of GDP per capita and average disposable household income, we analysed the data provided by the Lithuanian Department of Statistics (Statistics Lithuania) for 2014–2017. Due to a lack of data to estimate gross hourly wages, we examined the statistical data from the Lithuanian Department of Statistics for 2014. The results show that the hypothesis has not been confirmed. According to the research results, there is a small distribution of income between different regions of a small economy, although the level of economic development of different regions differs. The study findings are important not only from an academic perspective for identifying the causes of income inequality and raising questions for further research, but also for regional economic policy makers. The obtained results show that decisions related to a more equal distribution of income in Lithuania as a small country are determined not only by the specificity of its regions but also by the general trends of the country.
References
Leiman, V. S. (2010). The distribution of income in a market economy. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika [CSU Bulletin. Economic sciences], 28, 37-41. Retrieved from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ raspredelenie-dohodov-v-rynochnoy-ekonomike/viewer (Date of access: 19.01.2019). (In Russ.)
Stukalenko, E. A. (2014). Differentiation of Population's Income: Causes and Consequences. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya "Ekonomika" [Herald of Omsk University. Series "Economics"], 1, 183-187. Retrieved from: http://journal.omeco.ru/ru/archive/doc/2014_01/183-187.pdf (Date of access: 18.02.2019). (In Russ.)
Sharin, V. I. (2014). The problems of Excessive Income Differentiation of the Population in Russia. Journal of New Economy, 1(51), 38-42. (In Russ.)
Malkina, M. Y. (2014). Dynamics and Determinants of Intra and Inter-Regional Income Differentiation of the Population of the Russian Federation. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika [Spatial Economics], 3, 44-66. DOI: 10.14530/ se.2014.3.44-66. (In Russ.)
Vasilyeva, E. V. (2010). Interregional Differentiation of Quality of Life in Russia. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 4, 234-242. (In Russ.)
Maknickiene, N., Lapinskaite, I., Miecinskiene, A. & Skackauskiene, I. (2018). Patterns of Inequality of Lithuanian Regions. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 19(2), 323-342. DOI: 10.3846/jbem.2018.5574.
Lazutka, R. (2003). Population's Income inequality. Retrieved from: http://mokslozurnalai.lmaleidykla.lt/publ/0235-7186/2003/2/F-22.pdf (Date of access: 19.01.2019). (In Lith.)
Skuciene, D. (2008). Income Inequality in Lithuania. Filosofija. Sociologija[Philosophy. Sociology], 19(4), 22-33. Retrieved from: https://etalpykla.lituanistikadb.lt/object/LT-LDB-0001:J.04~2008~1367163079280/J.04~2008~1367163079280.pdf (Date of access: 29.03.2019). (In Lith.)
Ivaskaite-Tamosiune, V. (2013). Income Redistribution in Emerging Welfare Capitalism in Lithuania. Doctoral dissertation. Vilnius: Vilnius University, 254.././././././././Asus/Downloads/1923438.pdf (Date of access: 29.01.2019). (In Lith.)
Ciegis, R. & Dilius A. (2015). Assessment of Impact of Income Inequality on Sustainable Economic Growth. In: D. Streimikiene (Ed.), Sustainable Development Issues and Its Solutions in Lithuania (pp. 9-50). Vilnius: Vilnius University. (In Lith.)
Skuciene, D. & Kaminaite, G. (2017). The Meanings and Experiences of Income Inequality in Everyday Life. Social Work, 15(2), 101-114. DOI: 10.13165/SD-17-15-2-06. (In Lith.)
Wright, E. O. (2000). Reducing Income and wealth Inequality: Real Utopian Proposals. Contemporary Sociology, 29(1), 143-156. DOI: 10.2307/2654939.
Di Falco, E. (2014). Income Inequality: Nearly 40 Per Cent of Total Income Goes to People Belonging to Highest (Fifth) Quintile. Statistics in focus 12/2014. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Archive:Income_inequality_statistics,_data_2012 (Date of access: 20.04.2019).
Stiglitz, J. E. (2016). How to Restore Equitable and Sustainable Economic Growth in the United States. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 106(5), 43-47. DOI: 10.1257/aer.p20161006.
Palley, T. (2017). Inequality and Growth in Neo-Kaleckian and Cambridge Growth Theory. Review of Keynesian Economics, 5(2), 146-169. DOI: 10.4337/roke.2017.02.02.
Baek, J. & Gweisah, G. (2013). Does Income Inequality Harm the Environment? Empirical Evidence from the United States. Energy Policy, 62, 1434-1437. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.097.
Brunori, P., Ferreira, F. H. G. & Peragine, V. (2013). Inequality of Opportunity, Income Inequality and Economic Mobility: Some International Comparisons. IZA Discussion Paper, 85-115. DOI: 10.1057/9781137333117_5.
Kaasa, A. (2005). Factors of Income Inequality and Their Influence Mechanisms: A Theoretical Overview. University of Tartu Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper No. 40, 48. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.868491.
Garcia-Penalosa, C. & Orgiazzi, E. (2013). Factor Components of Inequality: A Cross-Country Study. The Review of Income and Wealth, 59(4), 689-727. DOI: 10.1111/roiw.12054.
Aaberge, R. (1995). Choosing Measures of Inequality for Empirical Applications. Discussions Papers No. 158. Retrieved from: https://www.ssb.no/a/publikasjoner/pdf/DP/dp_158.pdf (Date of access: 25.04.2019).
Ciuleviciene, V. (2007). Gini Coefficient and Its Application for the Measurement of Economic Inequality. Vagos, 77(30), 45-51. (In Lith.)
Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1-28.
Neves, P. C. & Silva, S. M. T. (2014). Inequality and Growth: Uncovering the Main Conclusions from the Empirics. Journal of Development Studies, 50(1), 1-21. DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2013.841885.
Turnovsky, S. J. (2013). The Relationship Between Economic Growth and Inequality. New Zealand Economic Papers, 47(2), 113-139. DOI: 10.1080/00779954.2013.776483.
Roshchina, J. (2005). Income Inequality and Education in Russia. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies Moscow], 4, 274-296. (In Russ.)
Balatskiy, E. V. & Saakyants, K. M. (2006). Divergentsiya Dohodov i Ekonomicheskiy rost. Nauchnye trudy: Institut narodnokhozyaystvennogo prognozirovaniya RAN [Scientific Articles - Institute of Economic Forecasting RAS]. Retrieved from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/divergentsiya-dohodov-i-ekonomicheskiy-rost/viewer (Date of access: 25.04.2019). (In Russ.)
Card, D. (2009). Immigration and Inequality. American Economic Review, 99(2), 1-21. DOI: 10.1257/aer.99.2.1.
Bourguignon, F. & Morrisson, C. (2002). Inequality Among World Citizens: 1820-1992. American Economic Review, 92(4), 727-744. DOI: 10.1257/00028280260344443.
Ali, A. A. G. (1998). Dealing with Poverty and Income Distribution Issues in Developing Countries: Cross-Regional Experiences. Journal of African Economies, 7(2), 77-115. DOI: 10.1093/jafeco/7.suppl_2.77.
Tirado, D. A., Diez-Minguela, A. & Martinez-Galarraga, J. (2016). Regional Inequality and Economic Development in Spain, 1860-2010. Journal of Historical Geography, 54, 87-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhg.2016.09.005.
Lessmann, C. & Seidel, A. (2017). Regional Inequality, Convergence, and Its Determinants - A View from Outer Space. European Economic Review, 92, 110-132. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.11.009.
Bellu, L. G. & Liberati, P. (2006). Inequality Analysis. The Gini Index. EASYPol. Retrieved from: http://www.fao. org/3/a-am352e.pdf (Date of access: 01.03.2019).
Sen, A. & Foster, J. E. (1997). On Economic Inequality (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 280.
De Maio, F. G. (2007). Income Inequality Measures. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 61(10), 849-852. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2006.052969.
Butkus, M. & Matuzeviciute, K. (2011). Evaluation of Economic Territorial (Regional) Disparities in Countries of the European Union. Economics and management: Current Issues and Perspectives, 3(23), 66-79. (In Lith.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Daiva Laskiene, Irena Pekarskiene, Rima Kontautiene

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

