Inclusive Growth: Comprehensive Dimension of Income Distribution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-1-23Keywords:
inclusive growth, inequality, household, income distribution, expenditureAbstract
The article aims to solve the problem of unequal income distribution in Malaysia. Income inequality did not change significantly since 1990. Inclusive growth is an alternative way that can help the government overcome the unequal distribution of income. However, there are no measurements or detailed studies conducted in Malaysia. Moreover, the country’s distribution policy for the 2016-2030 period focuses on inclusive economic growth. Based on the above gaps, we constructed the Malaysia Inclusive Index and estimated the income distribution using this new composite index. To construct the index, we applied the Z-score method. We obtained data for this study from the World Development Indicator, Economic Planning Unit, Department of Statistics, Malaysia and annual reports from various ministries. The main research findings show year-on-year growth from 1990 to 2016, indicating that economic growth in Malaysia is increasingly inclusive. Therefore, to achieve inclusive and equitable economic growth in distribution, the government is advised to consider not only fiscal aspects, but also holistic components comprised of education, health, housing and employment of the B40 group (lower class). Simultaneously, the M40 group (middle class) should not be left out. Income distribution factors and the Malaysia Inclusive Index (MII) determinants such as investment, inflation, education and national income should be considered when developing national distribution policies, as these factors are crucial for inclusive growth in Malaysia.References
Habito, C. F. (2009). Patterns of Inclusive Growth in Developing Asia: Insights from an Enhanced Growth-Poverty Elasticity Analysis. ADBI Working Paper Series, No. 145. Tokyo, Asian Development Bank Institute, 55.
McKinley, T. (2010). Inclusive Growth Criteria and Indicators: An Inclusive Growth Index for Diagnosis of Country Progress. ADB Sustainable Development Working Paper Series, Asian Development Bank, 36.
Bulman, D., Eden, M. & Nguyen, H. (2014). Transitioning from Low-Income Growth to High Income Growth. Is There a Middle Income Trap? Policy Research Working Paper No. 7104. World Bank, Washington DC, 30.
Flaaen, A., Ghani, E. & Mishra, S. (2013). How to Avoid Middle Income Traps? Evidence from Malaysia. Policy Research Working Paper Series No. 6427. Washington, DC: World Bank, 7.
Aiyar, S., Duval, R., Puy, D., Wu, Y. & Zhang, L. (2013). Growth Slowdowns and the Middle Income Trap. IMF Working Paper No. #WP/13/71. March. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, 63.
Egawa, A. (2013). Will Income Inequality Cause Middle-Income Trap in Asia. Bruegel Working Paper, 26.
United Nations Development Programme. (2014). Human Development Report: Sustaining Human Progress: Reducing Vulnerability and Building Resilience. United Nations Development Programme, New York, 227.
Malaysia Human Development Report. (2013). Redesigning an Inclusive Future. United Nations Development Report, United Nations Development, Malaysia, 334.
Klasen, S. (2010). Measuring and Monitoring Inclusive Growth: Multiple Definitions, Open Questions, and Some Constructive Proposals. ADB Sustainable Development Working Paper Series, No. 12. Mandaluyong City, Philippines, Asian Development Bank, 15.
McKinley, T. (2011). Inclusive Growth Criteria and Indicators: An Inclusive Growth Index for Diagnosis of Country Progress. ADB Sustainable Development Working Paper Series, No. 14. Mandaluyong City, Philippines, Asian Development Bank, 36.
Rauniyar, G. & Kanbur, R. (2010). Inclusive Development: Two Papers on Conceptualization, Application, and the ADB Perspective. Mandaluyong City, Philippines, Asian Development Bank, 45.
Ramos, R. A., Ranieri, R. & Lammens, J. W. (2013). Mapping Inclusive Growth in Developing Countries. IPC-IG Working Paper, No. 105. Brasilia, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
Adelman, I. & Morris, C. T. (1971). Economic Growth and Social Equity in Developing Countries. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA: 257 pages, 257.
Paukert, F. (1973). Income Distribution at Different Levels of Development: A Survey of Evidence. International Labour Review, 108(2), 97-125.
Ahluwalia, M. S. (1974). Income Inequality: some dimensions of the problem. In: H. Chenery et al., Redistribution with Growth (pp. 3-37). Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Robinson, S. (1976). Sources of Growth in Less Developed Countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 85(3), 391-408.
Anand, S. & Kanbur, S. M. R. (1984). The Kuznets Process and the Inequality Development Relationship. Journal of Development Economics, 40, 25-52.
Deininger, K. & Squire, L. (1996). Measuring income inequality: a new data-base. World Bank Economic Review, 10(3), 565-591.
Ali, I. (2007). Inequality and the Imperative for Inclusive Growth in Asia. Asian Development Review, 24(2), 1-16.
Dinda, S. (2014). Inclusive growth through creation of human and social capital. International Journal of Social Economics, 41(10), 878-895.
Banerjee, A. V. & Newman, A. F. (1993). Occupational Choice and the Process of Development. Journal of Political Economy, 101(2), 274-98.
Owen, A. L. & Weil, D. N. (1998). Intergenerational earnings mobility, inequality and growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 41(1), 71-104.
Maoz, Y. D & Moav, O. (1999). Intergenerational Mobility and the Process of Development. Economic Journal, 109(458), 677-697.
Hassler, J., Mora, J. V. R. & Zeira, J. (2007). Inequality and Mobility. Journal of Economic Growth, 12(3), 235-259.
Mirrlees, J. A. (1971). An exploration in the theory of optimum income taxation. Review of Economic Studies, 38, 175-208.
Lazear, E. & Rosen, S. (1981). Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 841-864.
Kaldor, N. (1956). Alternative Theories of Distribution. Review of Economic Studies, 23, 83-100.
Bourguignon, F. (1981). Pareto Superiority of Unegalitarian Equilibrium in Stiglitz's Model of Wealth Distribution with Convex Saving Function. Econometrica, 49, 1469-1475
Voitchovsky, S. (2005). Does the Profile of Income Inequality Matter for Economic Growth? Distinguishing between the Effects of Inequality in Different Parts of the Income Distribution. Journal of Economic Growth, 10(3), 273-296.
Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A. & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance & Social Progress. Paris. Retrieved from: http://www.stiglitzsenfitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf (Date of access: 05.07.2020)
Asian Development Bank. (2012). Asian Development Outlook 2012: Confronting Rising Inequality in Asia. Mandaluyong City, Philippines, Asian Development Bank, 272.
Mlachila, M., Tapsoba, R. & Tapsoba, S. J. A. (2014). A Quality of Growth Index for Developing Countries: A Proposal. IMF Working Paper, 32.
Ianchovichina, E. & Lundstrom, S. (2009). Inclusive Growth Analytics: Framework and Application. Policy Research Working Paper, No. 4851. Washington, DC, World Bank, 40.
Grosse, M., Harttgen, K. & Klasen, S. (2008). Measuring Pro-Poor Growth in Non-Income Dimensions. World Development, 36(6), 1021-1047.
Ali, I. & Zhuang, J. (2007). Inclusive Growth toward a Prosperous Asia: Policy Implications. ERD Working Paper Series No. 97. Manila: Asian Development Bank, 33.
Dagdeviren, H., van der Hoeven, R. & Weeks, J. (2000). Redistribution matters: Growth for Poverty Reduction. Employment Paper, No. 2000/10. Geneva, International Labour Organization, 36.
Ali, I. & Son, H. H. (2007). Measuring Inclusive Growth. Asian Development Review, 24(1), 11-31.
African Development Bank. (2012). Briefing Notes for AfDBs Long-Term Strategy - Briefing Note 6: Inclusive Growth Agenda. African Development Bank, Tunisia, 9.
Bhalla, S. (2007). Inclusive Growth? Focus on Employment. Social Scientist, 35(7/8), 24-43.
Kakwani, N. & Pernia, E. (2000). What is Pro-poor Growth? Asian Development Review: Studies of Asian and Pacific Economic Issues, Vol. 18, No. 1. Mandaluyong City, Philippines, Asian Development Bank, 16.
de Mello, L. & Dutz, M. A. (Eds.) (2012). Promoting Inclusive Growth: Challenges and Policies. Paris, OECD Publishing, 285.
White, W. R. (2012). Policy debate: How do you make growth more inclusive? In: L. de Mello, M. A. Dutz (Eds.), Promoting Inclusive Growth: Challenges and Policies (pp. 279-283). Paris, OECD Publishing, 279-283.
Kakwani, N. & Son, H. H. (2006). Pro-Poor Growth: The Asian Experience. Research Paper 2006/56. Helsinki: UNU-WIDER., 21.
Ravallion, M. & Chen, S. (2003). Measuring Pro-poor Growth. Economics Letters, 78, 93-99.
White, H. & Anderson, E. (2001). Growth versus Distribution: Does the Pattern of Growth Matter. Development Policy Review, 19(3), 267-289.
Kakwani, N., Khandker, S. & Son, H. H. (2004). Pro-poor Growth: Concepts and Measurement with Country Case Studies. IPC-IG Working Paper, No. 1. Brasilia, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
Kraay, A. (2004). When Is Growth Pro-Poor? Cross-Country Evidence. IMF Working Paper, No. 4-47. Washington, DC, International Monetary Fund, 34.
Guillaumont, P. (2009). An Economic Vulnerability Index: its Design and its Use for International Development Policy. UNU-WIDER Research Paper 2008/99, forthcoming in Oxford Development Studies, Vol. 37, No. 3, 32.
Stiglitz, J. (2012). The Price of Inequality. New York: W.W Norton, 560.
Seven, U. and Coçkun, Y. (2016). Does financial development reduce income inequality and poverty? Evidence from emerging countries. Emerging Markets Review, 26(C), 34-63.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Nor Fatimah Che Sulaiman, Mohd Fahmee Ab-Hamid, Abdul Rahim Ridzuan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
